New Thingy for Comments

Post by: on December 30th, 2005 | Filed Under Programming, Security

Ok, in hopes to get more comments, without requiring registration, yet without the threat of bots, I've installed a "captcha" plugin.

What is that you ask?

Its the text you have to fill in when you sign up for free email addresses. Yes, I know, I hate them too, but I now see why they're there. In two days of not requiring registration, I had to clean out 7 spam comments. It would be annoying to have to do that every day.

On an interesting note, IU is currently doing research into analog computing. I recently attended a talk about it, and the cheap analog computers they had could easily, no work involved, crack these captcha pictures. If any of you want to make a lot of money, and have no scruples.... well I digress.

Long story short, registration is not required, but encouraged for features I hope to roll out.... sometime. All you have to do is type the text in once, that's it.

Comments (No responses yet)

Communist Software

Post by: on December 28th, 2005 | Filed Under Interests, Programming

Ok, just got done reading a comment posted in reply to one of mine, which was just a funny comment about DRM problems. Completely a joke, this guy took it seriously. He makes some comments advocating DRM, and saying all software should be written for profit. WRONG! Here's what I think.
Read More »

Comments (3 responses so far)

Santa Claus: An Engineer’s Perspective

Post by: on December 24th, 2005 | Filed Under Uncategorized

Note: I do not know the original author of this work. If this is you, please step forward and get credit!

Santa Claus: An Engineer's Perspective

I. There are approximately 2 billion children (persons under 18) in the world. However, since Santa does not visit children of Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, Jehovah's Witnesses, or Buddist religions, this reduces the workload on Christmas night to 15% of the total, or 378 million (according to the Population Reference Bureau). At an average (census) rate of 3.5 children per household, that comes to 108 million homes, presuming that there is at least one good child in each.

II. Santa has about 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to the different time zones and rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west (which seems logical). This works out to 967.7 visits per second. This is to say that for each Christian household with at least one good child, Santa has around 1/1000th of a second to park the sleigh, jump out, go down the chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the tree, eat whatever snacks have been left for him, get back up the chimney, jump in the sleigh, and move on to the next house. (That's why it's really pointless to stay up and wait for him....)

Assuming that each of these 108 million stops is evenly distributed around the earth (which, of course, we know to be false, but will accept for the purposes of our calculations), we are now talking about 0.78 miles per household; a total trip of 75.5 million miles, not counting bathroom breaks. This means that Santa's sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second, 3000 times the speed of sound. For the purposes of comparison, the fastest man-made vehicle, the Ulysses space probe, moves at a pokey 75.4 miles per second, and a conventional reindeer can run (at best) 15 miles per hour.

III. The payload of the sleigh adds another interesting element. Assuming that each child has nothing more than a medium-sized Lego set (two pounds), the sleigh is carrying over 500 thousand tons, not counting Santa himself. On land, a conventional reindeer can pull nothing more than 300 pounds. Even granted that "flying" reindeer could pull ten times the normal amount, the job can't be done with eight or nine of them; Santa would need 360,000 of them. This increases the payload, not counting the sleigh itself, another 54,000 tons, or roughly seven times the weight of the Queen Elizibeth (the ship, not the monarch).

IV. 600,000 tons traveling at 650 miles per second creates enormous air resistance; this would heat up the reindeer in the same fasion as a spacecraft re-entering the earth's atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer would absorb 14.3 quintillion joules of energy per second each. In short, they would burst into flames almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer behind them and causing deafening sonic booms in their wake. The entire reindeer team would be vaporized within 4.2 thousandths of a second, or right about the time Santa reaches the fifth house on his trip. Not that it matters, however, since Santa, as a result of accelerating from a dead stop to 650 miles per second in .001 seconds, would be subjected to centrifugal forces of 17,500 G's. A 250 pound Santa (which seem ludicrously slim) would be pinned to the back of the sleigh by 4,315,015 pound of force, instantly crushing his bones and organs and reducing him to a quivering blob of pink goo.

V. Therefore, if Santa did exist, he's dead now.

Comments (One response so far)

Spam

Post by: on December 23rd, 2005 | Filed Under Security

Hey, I've already started getting spam on the comments... which sucks. Unless anyone responds to this saying they really really really want to be able to post without a user (which you can register over to the right) I'm turning it back to only registered users being able to post.

Comments (No responses yet)

Thinkgeek

Post by: on December 23rd, 2005 | Filed Under Interests

Hey. I just wanted to throw out a plug for a great company (actually two, after I finish writing).

I know many of you will get money for whatever holiday you celebrate, as I will, and be looking for something cool. I happen to love the site thinkgeek. I feel I should say that I was just accepted to their affiliates program, which means that if you use the link to the right (under "Affiliates") and purchase within 45 days (assuming you don't reset cookies, I'll bet) I get a 7% comission. I'm not doing this for comission, but because I really like their products, and was poking around on their site for banners to use to advertise. They're up there with newegg in terms of companies I would advertise for freely and use their services just about monthly. If you don't want to use the link over there, I understand a conflict of interests argument, just type their address (http://www.thinkgeek.com) into your browser by itself. I don't care. Either way, they get business.

Well, this is sounding too business like, so I'll leave it at I encourage you to use the two companies I mentioned above for holiday money. I already have picked out what I'll be getting.

Comments (No responses yet)

Phishing Protection

Post by: on December 22nd, 2005 | Filed Under Phishing, Security

Ok, my last post made me realize most people do suck at finding Phish, and wouldn't know what to do if it happened. So, here ya go.
Read More »

Comments (No responses yet)

Phishing test(s)

Post by: on December 22nd, 2005 | Filed Under Phishing, Security

Hey, here's a good test I stumbled across online just now. It deals with Phishing.
Read More »

Comments (No responses yet)

Great summary

Post by: on December 22nd, 2005 | Filed Under Digital Rights, Sony

Taken from a post on slashdot in response to one of the many Sony theads.
Read More »

Comments (No responses yet)

IM virii

Post by: on December 22nd, 2005 | Filed Under Security

Ho ho ho! It's that time of year again. No, not Christmas/ Chanukah/Kwanza/whatever you celebrate, but a new IM vrius is out. You might remember the one that went around in September, saying "look at the funny pic" as a link to a virus. That was later upgraded to respond with "lol, this is not a virus" Look, you can see me laughing at the irony as I remove it from 20 systems.
Read More »

Comments (No responses yet)

Sony, and the average user

Post by: on December 20th, 2005 | Filed Under Digital Rights, Sony

Ok then. Back by popular demand, my take on the Sony Fiasco, translated into human-ese.
Read on for more.
Read More »

Comments (2 responses so far)